[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f80fb10-dc7f-29be-dc3e-2715f8bafc6d@web.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 15:32:23 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [v2] Documentation: Coccinelle: fix typos and command example
>>>> We might stumble on different interpretations according to the wording “file basis”.
>>>> Do you find a message like “make: Nothing to be done for 'path/to/file.c'.” interesting then?
>>>>
>>>> * Would you like to add any links for information around the support for
>>>> source code checkers?
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Makefile?id=7c30b859a947535f2213277e827d7ac7dcff9c84#n198
>> …
>>> Feel free to submit patches.
>>
>> How do you think about to use the following command variant
>> for the adjustment of the software documentation?
>>
>> + make C=1 CHECK='scripts/coccicheck' 'path/to/file.o'
>
> I don't understand the reason for that change...
Is our understanding still incomplete for the support of source code checking parameters
by the make script?
* Will software analysis be performed in addition to the desired compilation
of a source file (according to the selected object file)?
* How do you think about to trigger only the generation of analysis results
for a single file?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists