linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.7 000/265] 5.7.7-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200701144134.GD2687961@sasha-vm>
Date:   Wed, 1 Jul 2020 10:41:34 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.7 000/265] 5.7.7-rc1 review

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:44:12AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 20:48, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.7.7 release.
>> There are 265 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed 01 Jul 2020 03:14:48 PM UTC.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-5.7.y&id2=v5.7.6
>>
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.7.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Sasha
>
>Results from Linaro’s test farm.
>No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Thanks for testing!

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha