linux-kernel - Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3: Migrate AES from hwmods to sysc-omap2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200701144415.GH37466@atomide.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Jul 2020 07:44:15 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        aford@...conembedded.com,
        Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3: Migrate AES from
 hwmods to sysc-omap2

* Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com> [200630 00:31]:
> 
> 
> On 6/30/20 2:12 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> [200617 17:28]:
> > > Hi Adam,
> > > 
> > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> > > 
> > > [auto build test ERROR on omap/for-next]
> > > [cannot apply to balbi-usb/testing/next]
> > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> > > improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> > > base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
> > This applies to v5.8-rc1, so the error above can be ignored now.
> > 
> > Applying patch into omap-for-v5.9/ti-sysc-drop-pdata.
> 
> Hi Tony,
> 
> Thanks for the feedback, we'll fix the wrong base.

OK thanks. Not sure what you use to determine the base, but in
general current Linux mainline master or for-next should work
as the base.

Regards,

Tony