[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1593709517-108857-6-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:05:15 -0700
From: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
To: peterz@...radead.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, olof@...om.net,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Factor out uncore_pci_pmu_unregister()
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
The PMU unregistration of a platform device is similar as a PCI device.
Factor out the codes of unregister a PCI PMU into a separate function. The
function will be used later.
There is no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index ccc90b0..b702dc3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -1118,6 +1118,16 @@ static int uncore_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id
return ret;
}
+static void uncore_pci_pmu_unregister(struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu,
+ struct intel_uncore_box *box)
+{
+ pmu->boxes[box->dieid] = NULL;
+ if (atomic_dec_return(&pmu->activeboxes) == 0)
+ uncore_pmu_unregister(pmu);
+ uncore_box_exit(box);
+ kfree(box);
+}
+
static void uncore_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct intel_uncore_box *box;
@@ -1145,11 +1155,8 @@ static void uncore_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
return;
pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
- pmu->boxes[box->dieid] = NULL;
- if (atomic_dec_return(&pmu->activeboxes) == 0)
- uncore_pmu_unregister(pmu);
- uncore_box_exit(box);
- kfree(box);
+
+ uncore_pci_pmu_unregister(pmu, box);
}
static int __init uncore_pci_init(void)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists