[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200702215832.625932449@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:58:20 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 08/18] tracing: not necessary to define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT to be empty again
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
After the previous cleanup, DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT's definition has no
relationship with DEFINE_EVENT. So After we re-define DEFINE_EVENT, it
is not necessary to define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT to be empty again.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200612092844.56107-5-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
include/trace/trace_events.h | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/trace_events.h b/include/trace/trace_events.h
index 43023c3e9d74..1bc3e7bba9a4 100644
--- a/include/trace/trace_events.h
+++ b/include/trace/trace_events.h
@@ -709,9 +709,6 @@ static inline void ftrace_test_probe_##call(void) \
check_trace_callback_type_##call(trace_event_raw_event_##template); \
}
-#undef DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT
-#define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT(template, name, proto, args, print)
-
#include TRACE_INCLUDE(TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE)
#undef __entry
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists