linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: Intel: kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max98927: Split be_hw_params

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFJ_xboZp02M3XAzTXMyUJU50CZDNBnrd_oOnYBWxFfMpr=1pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:09:59 +0200
From:   Łukasz Majczak <lma@...ihalf.com>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "N, Harshapriya" <harshapriya.n@...el.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        Radoslaw Biernacki <rad@...ihalf.com>,
        Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        "M R, Sathya Prakash" <sathya.prakash.m.r@...el.com>,
        Bob Brandt <brndt@...gle.com>, Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        Alex Levin <levinale@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: Intel: kbl_rt5663_rt5514_max98927: Split
 be_hw_params_fixup function

Hi,

I am also ok with Harsha patch. I have checked it on my Eve and it looks ok.

Best regards,

Lukasz

śr., 1 lip 2020 o 19:08 Pierre-Louis Bossart
<pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com> napisał(a):
>
>
> >>> Tested and the following is something we can use without creating a new
> >> dailink.
> >>>             struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai = asoc_rtd_to_codec(rtd, 0);
> >>>     if (!strcmp(codec_dai->name, KBL_REALTEK_DMIC_CODEC_DAI)) {
> >>>             if (params_channels(params) == 2 ||
> >> DMIC_CH(dmic_constraints) == 2)
> >>>                     channels->min = channels->max = 2;
> >>>             else
> >>>                     channels->min = channels->max = 4;
> >>>     } else {
> >>>             rate->min = rate->max = 48000;
> >>>             channels->min = channels->max = 2;
> >>>             snd_mask_none(fmt);
> >>>             snd_mask_set_format(fmt, pcm_fmt);
> >>>     }
> >>>
> >>> Pierre, thoughts?
> >>
> >> thanks Harsha, that looks like what I had in mind, but my earlier question was
> >> why we deal with the rates and formats only in the last case?
> > The speaker codec supported only 16 bit.  (Vendor mentioned)
> > For playback on this platform, only 48Khz was used.
>
> ok then, as long as Harsha and Lukasz are aligned I'm fine. Thanks!
>