linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/6] Cleanup mlx5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200702130809.GU23821@mellanox.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:08:09 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/6] Cleanup mlx5_ib main file

On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:18:03AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> 
> Over the years, the main.c file grew above all imagination and was >8K
> LOC of the code. This caused to a huge burden while I started to work on
> ib_flow allocation patches.
> 
> This series implements long standing "internal" wish to move flow logic
> from the main to separate file.
> 
> Based on
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20200630101855.368895-4-leon@kernel.org

Isn't this the series you said to drop? Can this be applied
independently?

Jason