[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878sg2t5ls.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 15:21:35 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/10] timer: Lower base clock forwarding threshold
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org> writes:
> There is no apparent reason for not forwarding base->clk when it's 2
> jiffies late, except perhaps for past optimizations. But since forwarding
> has to be done at some point now anyway, this doesn't stand anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/time/timer.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
> index 439fee098e76..25a55c043297 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
> @@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ static inline void forward_timer_base(struct timer_base *base)
> * Also while executing timers, base->clk is 1 offset ahead
> * of jiffies to avoid endless requeuing to current jffies.
> */
> - if ((long)(jnow - base->clk) < 2)
> + if ((long)(jnow - base->clk) < 1)
> return;
The apparent reason is in the comment right above the condition ...
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists