[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200702141825.GA16941@willie-the-truck>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 15:18:25 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] firmware: QCOM_SCM: Allow qcom_scm driver to be
loadable as a permenent module
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:10:39AM +0000, John Stultz wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> index b510f67dfa49..714893535dd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> @@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ config SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
> config ARM_SMMU
> tristate "ARM Ltd. System MMU (SMMU) Support"
> depends on (ARM64 || ARM || (COMPILE_TEST && !GENERIC_ATOMIC64)) && MMU
> + depends on QCOM_SCM || !QCOM_SCM #if QCOM_SCM=m this can't be =y
> select IOMMU_API
> select IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE
> select ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU if ARM
This looks like a giant hack. Is there another way to handle this?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists