[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACi5LpP+kFLv97guJ126xKk4_mfy2nFMp36KnDiXxPZ1ya2jPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:56:35 +0530
From: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>
To: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
RuiRui Yang <dyoung@...hat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
John Donnelly <John.P.donnelly@...cle.com>,
Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.pkin@...il.com>,
nsaenzjulienne@...e.de, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, guohanjun@...wei.com,
xiexiuqi@...wei.com, huawei.libin@...wei.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
kexec mailing list <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/5] support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump
Hi Chen,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 9:24 AM Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> This patch series enable reserving crashkernel above 4G in arm64.
>
> There are following issues in arm64 kdump:
> 1. We use crashkernel=X to reserve crashkernel below 4G, which will fail
> when there is no enough low memory.
> 2. Currently, crashkernel=Y@X can be used to reserve crashkernel above 4G,
> in this case, if swiotlb or DMA buffers are required, crash dump kernel
> will boot failure because there is no low memory available for allocation.
> 3. commit 1a8e1cef7603 ("arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32") broken
> the arm64 kdump. If the memory reserved for crash dump kernel falled in
> ZONE_DMA32, the devices in crash dump kernel need to use ZONE_DMA will alloc
> fail.
>
> To solve these issues, introduce crashkernel=X,low to reserve specified
> size low memory.
> Crashkernel=X tries to reserve memory for the crash dump kernel under
> 4G. If crashkernel=Y,low is specified simultaneously, reserve spcified
> size low memory for crash kdump kernel devices firstly and then reserve
> memory above 4G.
>
> When crashkernel is reserved above 4G in memory and crashkernel=X,low
> is specified simultaneously, kernel should reserve specified size low memory
> for crash dump kernel devices. So there may be two crash kernel regions, one
> is below 4G, the other is above 4G.
> In order to distinct from the high region and make no effect to the use of
> kexec-tools, rename the low region as "Crash kernel (low)", and pass the
> low region by reusing DT property "linux,usable-memory-range". We made the low
> memory region as the last range of "linux,usable-memory-range" to keep
> compatibility with existing user-space and older kdump kernels.
>
> Besides, we need to modify kexec-tools:
> arm64: support more than one crash kernel regions(see [1])
>
> Another update is document about DT property 'linux,usable-memory-range':
> schemas: update 'linux,usable-memory-range' node schema(see [2])
>
> The previous changes and discussions can be retrieved from:
>
> Changes since [v9]
> - Patch 1 add Acked-by from Dave.
> - Update patch 5 according to Dave's comments.
> - Update chosen schema.
>
> Changes since [v8]
> - Reuse DT property "linux,usable-memory-range".
> Suggested by Rob, reuse DT property "linux,usable-memory-range" to pass the low
> memory region.
> - Fix kdump broken with ZONE_DMA reintroduced.
> - Update chosen schema.
>
> Changes since [v7]
> - Move x86 CRASH_ALIGN to 2M
> Suggested by Dave and do some test, move x86 CRASH_ALIGN to 2M.
> - Update Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt.
> Add corresponding documentation to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt
> suggested by Arnd.
> - Add Tested-by from Jhon and pk.
>
> Changes since [v6]
> - Fix build errors reported by kbuild test robot.
>
> Changes since [v5]
> - Move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kernel/crash_core.c.
> - Delete crashkernel=X,high.
> - Modify crashkernel=X,low.
> If crashkernel=X,low is specified simultaneously, reserve spcified size low
> memory for crash kdump kernel devices firstly and then reserve memory above 4G.
> In addition, rename crashk_low_res as "Crash kernel (low)" for arm64, and then
> pass to crash dump kernel by DT property "linux,low-memory-range".
> - Update Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
>
> Changes since [v4]
> - Reimplement memblock_cap_memory_ranges for multiple ranges by Mike.
>
> Changes since [v3]
> - Add memblock_cap_memory_ranges back for multiple ranges.
> - Fix some compiling warnings.
>
> Changes since [v2]
> - Split patch "arm64: kdump: support reserving crashkernel above 4G" as
> two. Put "move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kexec_core.c" in a separate
> patch.
>
> Changes since [v1]:
> - Move common reserve_crashkernel_low() code into kernel/kexec_core.c.
> - Remove memblock_cap_memory_ranges() i added in v1 and implement that
> in fdt_enforce_memory_region().
> There are at most two crash kernel regions, for two crash kernel regions
> case, we cap the memory range [min(regs[*].start), max(regs[*].end)]
> and then remove the memory range in the middle.
>
> [1]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2020-June/020737.html
> [2]: https://github.com/robherring/dt-schema/pull/19
> [v1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/2/1174
> [v2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/9/86
> [v3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/9/306
> [v4]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/15/273
> [v5]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/6/1360
> [v6]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/30/142
> [v7]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/23/411
> [v8]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/21/213
> [v9]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/28/73
>
> Chen Zhou (5):
> x86: kdump: move reserve_crashkernel_low() into crash_core.c
> arm64: kdump: reserve crashkenel above 4G for crash dump kernel
> arm64: kdump: add memory for devices by DT property
> linux,usable-memory-range
> arm64: kdump: fix kdump broken with ZONE_DMA reintroduced
> kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel on arm64
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst | 14 ++-
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 17 +++-
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 8 +-
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 74 ++++++++++++---
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 66 ++------------
> include/linux/crash_core.h | 3 +
> include/linux/kexec.h | 2 -
> kernel/crash_core.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/kexec_core.c | 17 ----
> 9 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.20.1
Thanks for the v10.
1. Seems this series is still broken on arm64 boards like ampere and
ThunderX2 (marvell) because of the ZONE_DMA32 related OOM seen while
booting kdump kernel.
Here are details about my environment:
- Latest upstream Linus master branch (5.8.0-rc3) + your v10 patches.
- Latest upstream kexec-tools + your v4 patch.
# dmesg | grep -i crash
[ 0.000000] crashkernel reserved: 0x00000000ca000000 -
0x00000000ea000000 (512 MB)
[ 0.000000] Kernel command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=(hd13,gpt2)/vmlinuz-5.8.0-rc3+
root=/dev/mapper/rhel_hpe--apache--cn99xx--09-root ro
rd.lvm.lv=rhel_hpe-apache-cn99xx-09/root
rd.lvm.lv=rhel_hpe-apache-cn99xx-09/swap crashkernel=512M
[ 58.917523] crashkernel=512M
2. Here is the OOM crash seen while booting the kdump kernel:
[ 0.244724] DMA: preallocated 128 KiB GFP_KERNEL pool for atomic allocations
[ 0.251859] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address 0000000000000188
[ 0.260737] Mem abort info:
[ 0.263553] ESR = 0x96000006
[ 0.266632] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 0.271994] SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 0.275074] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ 0.278239] Data abort info:
[ 0.281141] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006
[ 0.285010] CM = 0, WnR = 0
[ 0.288001] [0000000000000188] user address but active_mm is swapper
[ 0.294420] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] SMP
[ 0.299344] Modules linked in:
[ 0.302424] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.8.0-rc3+ #8
[ 0.308753] Hardware name: HPE Apollo 70 /C01_APACHE_MB
, BIOS L50_5.13_1.11 06/18/2019
[ 0.318599] pstate: 00400009 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
[ 0.324228] pc : mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages+0x2c/0x60
[ 0.329506] lr : shrink_lruvec+0x404/0x4f8
[ 0.333638] sp : fffffe0012b8f840
[ 0.336979] x29: fffffe0012b8f840 x28: fffffe00116b3000
[ 0.342343] x27: fffffe0012b8fb00 x26: 0000000000000020
[ 0.347707] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: fffffc0069fffe28
[ 0.353070] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000
[ 0.358433] x21: 000000000000003c x20: fffffe0012b8fa98
[ 0.363796] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000010
[ 0.369159] x17: 00000000bd8afee8 x16: 000000001260aa76
[ 0.374523] x15: ffffffffffffffff x14: fffffe00116b3988
[ 0.379886] x13: fffffe0092b8faa7 x12: fffffe0012b8faaf
[ 0.385248] x11: fffffe00116f1000 x10: fffffe0012b8fa30
[ 0.390612] x9 : fffffe0010244ebc x8 : 0000000000000000
[ 0.395975] x7 : 0000000000000020 x6 : 00000000ffff8ae3
[ 0.401338] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : fffffc004da89000
[ 0.406701] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000
[ 0.412064] x1 : fffffe00116bf000 x0 : 0000000000000000
[ 0.417427] Call trace:
[ 0.419891] mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages+0x2c/0x60
[ 0.424815] shrink_node+0x1a8/0x688
[ 0.428420] do_try_to_free_pages+0xe8/0x448
[ 0.432729] try_to_free_pages+0x110/0x230
[ 0.436863] __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.106+0x2b8/0xb48
[ 0.442666] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2ac/0x2f8
[ 0.447239] alloc_page_interleave+0x20/0x90
[ 0.451548] alloc_pages_current+0xdc/0xf8
[ 0.455681] atomic_pool_expand+0x60/0x210
[ 0.459817] __dma_atomic_pool_init+0x50/0xa4
[ 0.464214] dma_atomic_pool_init+0xac/0x158
[ 0.468522] do_one_initcall+0x50/0x218
[ 0.472393] kernel_init_freeable+0x22c/0x2d0
[ 0.476792] kernel_init+0x18/0x110
[ 0.480310] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[ 0.483918] Code: 350001e3 d503201f f9450024 1400000a (f940c401)
[ 0.490074] ---[ end trace e5a9147af159e580 ]---
[ 0.494734] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
[ 0.500010] Rebooting in 10 seconds..
3. Did you test your patch with a simple crashkernel=512M command line
(without using the crashkernel hi/lo or crashkernel=X@Y format)?
Anyway, since this implementation still needs rework, we can go ahead
with the arrangement of limiting the crashkernel allocation in
ZONE_DMA range (as I suggested in another patch series
<http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2020-July/020777.html>) in
the meanwhile. to ensure the upstream kernel can still support kdump
on arm64 boards where it was working before the ZONE_DMA32 changes
were introduced for arm64.
Please let me know your views,
Thanks,
Bhupesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists