[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200703010720.GH5369@dread.disaster.area>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 11:07:20 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] xfs: Fix false positive lockdep warning with
sb_internal & fs_reclaim
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 08:59:23PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index 379cbff438bc..dcc97bad950a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -913,11 +913,21 @@ xfs_fs_freeze(
> struct super_block *sb)
> {
> struct xfs_mount *mp = XFS_M(sb);
> + unsigned long pflags;
> + int ret;
>
> + /*
> + * Disable fs reclaim in memory allocation for fs freeze to avoid
> + * causing a possible circular locking dependency lockdep splat
> + * relating to fs reclaim.
> + */
/*
* The filesystem is now frozen far enough that memory reclaim
* cannot safely operate on the filesystem. Hence we need to
* set a GFP_NOFS context here to avoid recursion deadlocks.
*/
> + current_set_flags_nested(&pflags, PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS);
memalloc_nofs_save/restore(), please.
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists