[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3b751fc-668d-91e2-220b-0d7edd231e01@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 14:18:18 +0300
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com>
Cc: aaron.ma@...onical.com, admin@...ma.net,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com,
hdegoede@...hat.com, hn.chen@...dahitech.com, jikos@...nel.org,
kai.heng.feng@...onical.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, vicamo.yang@...onical.com,
wsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: i2c-hid: Use block reads when possible to save
power
Hi
On 7/1/20 6:00 PM, Sultan Alsawaf wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 11:04:01AM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>> On 6/29/20 8:43 PM, Sultan Alsawaf wrote:
>>> Hmm, for some reason in 5.8 I get the same problem, but 5.7 is fine. Could you
>>> try this on 5.7 and see if it works?
>>>
>>> In the meantime I'll bisect 5.8 to see why it's causing problems for me...
>>>
>> I see the same issue on top of v5.7:
>
> Try reverting my "i2c: designware: Only check the first byte for SMBus block
> read length" patch and apply the following change instead:
>
This combination (the diff and this HID patch) works on top of v5.7.
I tried also these other combinations:
v5.7
- HID patch + this diff -> ok
- HID patch -> not ok
- HID + acked i2c-dw patch -> acked i2c-dw patch doesn't apply
v5.8-rc3
- acked i2c-dw patch -> ok
- HID patch -> nok
- HID patch + acked i2c-dw patch -> nok
- HID patch + this diff -> diff doesn't apply
Hopefully gives some glue. I'll be out of office for a few weeks and
unfortunately cannot test patches meanwhile.
Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists