[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a66d9a0-7ada-d0b0-f768-9901494175e4@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 17:24:21 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, will@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2, ID_DFR1,
ID_MMFR5 and other changes
On 07/02/2020 11:04 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:33:35AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> These are remaining patches from V4 series which had some pending reviews
>> from Suzuki (https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11557333/). Also dropped
>> [PATCH 15/17] as that will need some more investigation and rework.
>>
>> This series applies on arm64/for-next/cpufeature.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>> Cc: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>
> Thanks Suzuki for review.
>
> Anshuman, could you please rebase this series on top of 5.8-rc3? It no
> longer applies cleanly.
Already posted here.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=312281
Powered by blists - more mailing lists