linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Add KRYO4XX silver CPU cores to erratum list 1530923 and 1024718

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Jul 2020 14:55:15 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Add KRYO4XX silver CPU cores to erratum list
 1530923 and 1024718

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:30:55PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> KRYO4XX silver/LITTLE CPU cores with revision r1p0 are affected by
> erratum 1530923 and 1024718, so add them to the respective list.
> The variant and revision bits are implementation defined and are
> different from the their Cortex CPU counterparts on which they are
> based on, i.e., r1p0 is equivalent to rdpe.

So just to confirm, revisions prior to rdpe are unaffected, or do those
parts simply not exist?

Cheers,

Will