linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Add KRYO4XX silver CPU cores to erratum list 1530923 and 1024718

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 03 Jul 2020 20:04:04 +0530
From:   Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Add KRYO4XX silver CPU cores to erratum list
 1530923 and 1024718

Hi Will,

On 2020-07-03 19:25, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:30:55PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>> KRYO4XX silver/LITTLE CPU cores with revision r1p0 are affected by
>> erratum 1530923 and 1024718, so add them to the respective list.
>> The variant and revision bits are implementation defined and are
>> different from the their Cortex CPU counterparts on which they are
>> based on, i.e., r1p0 is equivalent to rdpe.
> 
> So just to confirm, revisions prior to rdpe are unaffected, or do those
> parts simply not exist?
> 

There is one revision prior to this r0p1(r7pc) which has a different 
part
number and are used in v1 of SoCs which are limited to only internal 
test
platforms in the early stages of bringup and not used in actual devices 
out
there, so I did not add it to the list but they are affected. Plus we 
would
need to add another MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_4XX_SILVER_V1 if we are supporting 
them
which I thought was not worth it when devices with those CPUs are not 
available.

Thanks,
Sai

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation