[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMi6JoYvi87jrhXuaF6THmoJVzwbOxzGR8VV8JYeKdVOZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:14:16 -0700
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
ksummit <ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tech-board-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Chris Mason <clm@...clm>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 1:19 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Recent events have prompted a Linux position statement on inclusive
> terminology. Given that Linux maintains a coding-style and its own
> idiomatic set of terminology here is a proposal to answer the call to
> replace non-inclusive terminology.
>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@...clm>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
I'm happy to support this, I agree with the general approach as well
as the motivations thereof.
At your discretion, feel free to add:
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Or Acked-by, or whatever other label you prefer to use to show
agreement and support.
-Olof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists