[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPM=9ty0tiL_qM_UFv0S0VtARKz_f-Anngc+amDM5LjGAHazhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 09:41:47 +1000
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
ksummit <ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tech-board-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Chris Mason <clm@...clm>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology
'. Colors to represent a policy requires an indirection. The
>
> how about:
> Using colors to represent a policy requires an indirection.
I'd totally submit that red/black trees while in no way racist, are a
horrible indirection, as it means nothing if you've never interacted
with gambling culture, (and maybe James Bond movies).
left/right trees make naturally more sense and translate into more
languages, so yes I think removal of color naming is a good thing even
for non-racist reasonings.
Dave.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists