[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5499a8192434347d864cf1b2ce78c5ef135197ae.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 17:08:56 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Mason <clm@...clm>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
tech-board-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ksummit <ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle:
Inclusive Terminology
On Sun, 2020-07-05 at 09:39 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Why haven't they submitted patches
> removing slavery terminology from the kernel before?
Because inhuman devices in a master/slave hierarchy isn't
anything like chattel slavery?
Blacklist/whitelist has nothing to do with skin color?
Are red-black trees next?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists