linux-kernel - Re: Are there some potentially serious problems that I should be aware of if I totally disable the CONFIG_ACPI option on the X86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAvDm6ZYh7wirQx4QQb13js5VOcK8BcHu_0e1zAQyO+Y2xrk9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 5 Jul 2020 09:47:59 +0800
From:   孙世龙 sunshilong <sunshilong369@...il.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
        kernelnewbies <Kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Are there some potentially serious problems that I should be
 aware of if I totally disable the CONFIG_ACPI option on the X86_64 platform?

I see. Thank you .

Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> 于2020年7月5日周日 上午4:09写道：
>
> On Sat 2020-07-04 21:34:36, 孙世龙 sunshilong wrote:
> > Thank you for taking the time to respond to me.
> >
> > >These machines are still mostly IBM-PC compatible, so it is likely to
> > >somehow work. You'll likely get worse power and thermal
> > >management. Try it.
> > It's an industrial personal computer with an Intel processor.
> > What I am worried about is that it may damage the hardware.
>
> I'd simply try it. Risk is really quite low...
>
> If in doubt, you could ask vendor.
>
> But you will not get definitive answers on the mailing list...
>
>                                                                         Pavel
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html