linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] trace doc: fix typo of trace/ftrace.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200705141118.491a8045@lwn.net>
Date:   Sun, 5 Jul 2020 14:11:18 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Manbing <manbing3@...il.com>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org (open list:DOCUMENTATION),
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace doc: fix typo of trace/ftrace.rst

On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:53:55 -0700
Manbing <manbing3@...il.com> wrote:

> Some documents was converted from the plain text documentation
> to reStructuredText format.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manbing <manbing3@...il.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

I've applied this, thanks.  I did change the subject line, though, since a
failure to update the names of some documents is not exactly a "typo".

In the future, please include your full name in the Signed-off-by tag.
For something this trivial it wasn't worth making a fuss about, but
maintainers are likely to balk with more significant changes.

Thanks,

jon