[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200705032732.GT25523@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 04:27:32 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Jan Ziak <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
mtk.manpages@...il.com, shuah@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] readfile(2): a new syscall to make open/read/close
faster
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 05:18:58AM +0200, Jan Ziak wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 5:12 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > You should probably take a look at io_uring. That has the level of
> > complexity of this proposal and supports open/read/close along with many
> > other opcodes.
>
> Then glibc can implement readfile using io_uring and there is no need
> for a new single-file readfile syscall.
It could, sure. But there's also a value in having a simple interface
to accomplish a simple task. Your proposed API added a very complex
interface to satisfy needs that clearly aren't part of the problem space
that Greg is looking to address.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists