[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200706231844.GA168946@bjorn-Precision-5520>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 18:18:44 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"open list:AMD IOMMU (AMD-VI)" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Krishnakumar, Lalithambika" <lalithambika.krishnakumar@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Prashant Malani <pmalani@...gle.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...gle.com>,
Todd Broch <tbroch@...gle.com>,
Alex Levin <levinale@...gle.com>,
Mattias Nissler <mnissler@...gle.com>,
Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@...il.com>,
Bernie Keany <bernie.keany@...el.com>,
Aaron Durbin <adurbin@...gle.com>,
Diego Rivas <diegorivas@...gle.com>,
Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...gle.com>,
Furquan Shaikh <furquan@...gle.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>,
Christian Kellner <christian@...lner.me>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] PCI: Keep the ACS capability offset in device
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 03:16:42PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:58 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 09:49:37PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> > > +static void pci_enable_acs(struct pci_dev *dev);
> >
> > I don't think we need this forward declaration, do we?
>
> We need it unless we move its definition further up in the file:
>
> drivers/pci/pci.c: In function ‘pci_restore_state’:
> drivers/pci/pci.c:1551:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘pci_enable_acs’; did you mean ‘pci_enable_ats’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 1551 | pci_enable_acs(dev);
>
> Do you want me to move it up in the file so that we do not need the
> forward declaration?
Yes, please move it. Maybe a preliminary patch that moves it but
doesn't change anything else.
I think I thought you had renamed the function, in which case you
could tell from the patch itself. But I was mistaken!
> > > @@ -4653,7 +4653,7 @@ static int pci_quirk_intel_spt_pch_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
> > > if (!pci_quirk_intel_spt_pch_acs_match(dev))
> > > return -ENOTTY;
> > >
> > > - pos = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ACS);
> > > + pos = dev->acs_cap;
> >
> > I assume you verified that all these quirks are FINAL quirks, since
> > pci_init_capabilities() is called after HEADER quirks. I'll
> > double-check before applying this.
>
> None of these quirks are applied via DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_*(). All these
> quirks are called (directly or indirectly) from either
> pci_enable_acs() or pci_acs_enabled(),
>
> EXCEPT
>
> pci_idt_bus_quirk(). That one is called from
> pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id() which should be called only after the
> parent bridge has been added and setup correctly.
>
> So it looks all good to me.
Great, thanks for checking that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists