[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mu4cjixj.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 16:57:28 -0700
From: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: Add support for event log pointer found in TPM2 ACPI table
Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2020-07-06 16:09 MST:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 02:19:53PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>>
>> In case a TPM2 is attached, search for a TPM2 ACPI table when trying
>> to get the event log from ACPI. If one is found, use it to get the
>> start and length of the log area. This allows non-UEFI systems, such
>> as SeaBIOS, to pass an event log when using a TPM2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Do you think that QEMU with TPM 1.2 emulator turned on would be a viable
> way to test this?
>
> I'm anyway more worried about breaking existing TPM 1.2 functionality
> and that requires only QEMU without extras.
>
> /Jarkko
The 1.2 bits should be functionally the same as before, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists