[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200706160309.5f03bb2e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:03:09 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dmaengine tree with the
dmaengine-fixes tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 10:11:46 +0530 Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 05-07-20, 21:23, Dave Jiang wrote:
> >
> > On 7/5/2020 8:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the dmaengine tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > > drivers/dma/idxd/sysfs.c
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > > da32b28c95a7 ("dmaengine: idxd: cleanup workqueue config after disabling")
> > >
> > > from the dmaengine-fixes tree and commit:
> > >
> > > f50b150e315e ("dmaengine: idxd: add work queue drain support")
> > >
> > > from the dmaengine tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > > complex conflicts.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Stephen. Thanks for the fixup. I think there are two more bits that are
> > needed from f50b150e315e if you don't mind adding:
>
> I will merge the fixes into next so it should be resolved for tomorrow,
Thanks,
> >
> > diff --cc drivers/dma/idxd/sysfs.c
> > index 2e2c5082f322,6f0711a822a1..000000000000
> > --- a/drivers/dma/idxd/sysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/idxd/sysfs.c
> > @@@ -313,14 -303,7 +303,12 @@@ static int idxd_config_bus_remove(struc
> > }
> >
> > idxd_unregister_dma_device(idxd);
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&idxd->dev_lock, flags);
> > rc = idxd_device_disable(idxd);
> > + for (i = 0; i < idxd->max_wqs; i++) {
> > + struct idxd_wq *wq = &idxd->wqs[i];
> > +
> >
> > > mutex_lock(&wq->wq_lock);
> >
> > + idxd_wq_disable_cleanup(wq);
> >
> > > mutex_unlock(&wq->wq_lock);
> >
> > + }
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&idxd->dev_lock, flags);
> > module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> > if (rc < 0)
> > dev_warn(dev, "Device disable failed\n");
>
I added that fix up by hand today just in case it matters for testing.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists