lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:28:29 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the s390
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h

between commit:

  74ecbef7b908 ("s390/zcrypt: code beautification and struct field renames")

from the s390 tree and commit:

  a0062965cc01 ("mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h
index 1a1d5e3c8d45,823de10479bd..000000000000
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h
@@@ -219,8 -218,8 +219,8 @@@ static inline void ap_init_message(stru
   */
  static inline void ap_release_message(struct ap_message *ap_msg)
  {
- 	kzfree(ap_msg->msg);
- 	kzfree(ap_msg->private);
 -	kfree_sensitive(ap_msg->message);
++	kfree_sensitive(ap_msg->msg);
+ 	kfree_sensitive(ap_msg->private);
  }
  
  /*

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists