lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 6 Jul 2020 09:46:48 +0200
From:   Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
To:     Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
        "Anson.Huang@....com" <Anson.Huang@....com>,
        "leoyang.li@....com" <leoyang.li@....com>,
        "andreas@...nade.info" <andreas@...nade.info>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "linux-imx@....com" <linux-imx@....com>,
        "rjones@...eworks.com" <rjones@...eworks.com>,
        "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "michael@...le.cc" <michael@...le.cc>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "sebastien.szymanski@...adeus.com" <sebastien.szymanski@...adeus.com>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org" <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: Add the Kontron i.MX8M-Mini SoMs and
 baseboards

Hi Marcel,

On 03.07.20 09:56, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> Hi Frieder
> 
> Nice to see some more i.MX 8M Mini action. Much appreciated!
> 
> On Thu, 2020-07-02 at 16:33 +0200, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
>> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
>>
>> Kontron Electronics GmbH offers small and powerful SoMs based on the
>> i.MX8MM
> 
> To avoid much confusion in NXP's nomenclature I would recommend writing this always as i.MX 8M Mini. Of course,
> in code, using imx8mm is fine.

Ok, sounds reasonable.

> 
>> including PMIC, LPDDR4-RAM, eMMC and SPI NOR.
>>
>> The matching baseboards have the same form factor and similar interfaces
>> as the other boards from the Kontron "Board-Line" family, including
>> SD card, 1G Ethernet, 100M Ethernet, USB Host/OTG, digital IOs, RS232,
>> RS485, CAN, LVDS or HDMI, RTC and much more.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
>> ---
>>   .../dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8010-s.dts  |  15 +
>>   .../freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8010-som.dtsi   |  16 +
>>   .../dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8011-s.dts  |  15 +
>>   .../freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8011-som.dtsi   |  16 +
>>   .../dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n801x-s.dtsi | 326 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   .../freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n801x-som.dtsi   | 281 +++++++++++++++
>>   6 files changed, 669 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8010-s.dts
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8010-som.dtsi
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8011-s.dts
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8011-som.dtsi
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n801x-s.dtsi
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n801x-som.dtsi
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8010-s.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-
>> kontron-n8010-s.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..0911f2d0555b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8010-s.dts
>> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> 
> Don't you want to use the more common GPL-2.0+ OR MIT variant which allows for more freedom? At least NXP's
> imx8mm.dtsi also uses that.

That actually sounds like a good idea. I will change that.

> 
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2019 Kontron Electronics GmbH
> 
> I know that there is much about 2020 to rather be ignored.

Indeed, but I also once learned that you don't change the original date 
in a copyright notice as it is used to express when the content has been 
published or created first (and the original version has been online on 
our server publically since 2019).

> 
>> + */
>> +
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +
>> +#include "imx8mm-kontron-n8010-som.dtsi"
>> +#include "imx8mm-kontron-n801x-s.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +	model = "Kontron i.MX8MM N8010 S";
>> +	compatible = "kontron,imx8mm-n8010-s", "kontron,imx8mm-n8010-som",
>> +		     "fsl,imx8mm";
> 
> I believe now with Linux having dropped the strict 80-column line length coding style limit we are allowed to
> go up to 100 (;-p).

Right, I remember seeing some discussion about extending the column 
limit. I will need to update my text editor's config.

> 
>> +};
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8010-som.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8010-som.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..5b178ce4ce1b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8010-som.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2019 Kontron Electronics GmbH
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "imx8mm-kontron-n801x-som.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +	model = "Kontron i.MX8MM N8010 SoM";
>> +	compatible = "kontron,imx8mm-n8010-som", "fsl,imx8mm";
>> +
>> +	memory@...00000 {
>> +		device_type = "memory";
>> +		reg = <0x0 0x40000000 0 0x80000000>;
>> +	};
>> +};
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8011-s.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-
>> kontron-n8011-s.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..5c44bd77ed32
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8011-s.dts
>> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2019 Kontron Electronics GmbH
>> + */
>> +
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +
>> +#include "imx8mm-kontron-n8011-som.dtsi"
>> +#include "imx8mm-kontron-n801x-s.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +	model = "Kontron i.MX8MM N8011 S";
>> +	compatible = "kontron,imx8mm-n8011-s", "kontron,imx8mm-n8011-som",
>> +		     "fsl,imx8mm";
>> +};
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8011-som.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8011-som.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..303594867b8f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n8011-som.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2019 Kontron Electronics GmbH
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "imx8mm-kontron-n801x-som.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +	model = "Kontron i.MX8MM N8011 SoM";
>> +	compatible = "kontron,imx8mm-n8011-som", "fsl,imx8mm";
>> +
>> +	memory@...00000 {
>> +		device_type = "memory";
>> +		reg = <0x0 0x40000000 0 0xC0000000>;
>> +	};
> 
> Isn't the boot loader supposed to filling that in?

Hm, probably yes. I thought it would be good to have the upstream DT 
fully describe the modules, including the memory size. But if it is more 
common or useful, I will fill in the memory size for the smallest 
configuration (1GB) only and let U-Boot overwrite the value if it 
detects modules with larger DDR.

> 
>> +};
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n801x-s.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n801x-s.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..d825e52e0beb
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-kontron-n801x-s.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,326 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2019 Kontron Electronics GmbH
>> + */
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +	aliases {
>> +		ethernet1 = &usbnet;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	/* fixed crystal dedicated to mcp2515 */
>> +	clk16m: clk16m {
> 
> I believe a more human readable variant e.g. as follows is preferred:
> 
> osc_16m: clock-osc-16m

Ok.

> 
>> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
>> +		clock-frequency = <16000000>;
> 
> Also the use of the optional property clock-output-names is recommended.

Ok.

> 
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	leds {
>> +		compatible = "gpio-leds";
>> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +		pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_gpio_led>;
>> +
>> +		led1 {
>> +			label = "led1";
>> +			gpios = <&gpio4 17 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> +			linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		led2 {
>> +			label = "led2";
>> +			gpios = <&gpio4 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		led3 {
>> +			label = "led3";
>> +			gpios = <&gpio4 18 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		led4 {
>> +			label = "led4";
>> +			gpios = <&gpio4 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		led5 {
>> +			label = "led5";
>> +			gpios = <&gpio4 9 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		led6 {
>> +			label = "led6";
>> +			gpios = <&gpio4 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> +		};
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	pwm-beeper {
>> +		compatible = "pwm-beeper";
>> +		pwms = <&pwm2 0 5000 0>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	reg_rst_eth2: regulator-rst-eth2 {
>> +		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> +		regulator-name = "rst-usb-eth2";
>> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +		pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_usb_eth2>;
>> +		gpio = <&gpio3 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> +		status = "okay";
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	vdd_5v: regulator-5v {
> 
> I would stick to consistent reg_ pre-fixing.

Ok.

> 
>> +		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> +		regulator-name = "vdd_5v";
>> +		regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> +		regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> +		regulator-boot-on;
>> +		regulator-always-on;
>> +		status = "okay";
>> +	};
>> +};
>> +
>> +&ecspi2 {
>> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ecspi2>;
>> +	cs-gpios = <&gpio5 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> +	status = "okay";
>> +
>> +	can0: can@0 {
>> +		compatible = "microchip,mcp2515";
>> +		reg = <0>;
>> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +		pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_can>;
>> +		clocks = <&clk16m>;
>> +		interrupt-parent = <&gpio4>;
>> +		interrupts = <28 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
>> +		spi-max-frequency = <100000>;
>> +		vdd-supply = <&vdd_3v3>;
>> +		xceiver-supply = <&vdd_5v>;
>> +		status = "okay";
> 
> I find the property ordering a little confusing but that might just be me.

I think it's "compatible", "reg" and "pinctrl" first, then the other 
properties in alphabetical order and "status" last. So I'm not really 
sure what to improve here.

> 
>> +	};
>> +};
>> +
>> +&ecspi3 {
>> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ecspi3>;
>> +	cs-gpios = <&gpio5 25 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> +	status = "okay";
>> +
>> +	userspi: userspi@0 {
>> +		compatible = "kontron,user-spi";
>> +		reg = <0>;
>> +		spi-max-frequency = <100000000>;
>> +		status = "okay";
>> +	};
> 
> I thought from earlier discussions you intended to drop that and either specify it from user-space directly or
> use an overlay instead.

Yes, indeed, but when I learned about the possibility to override the 
device's driver from userspace, I already had sent out this patch. I 
will remove the userspi node in the next version.

Thanks so far for reviewing!
Frieder

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ