[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200706122717.GC3401866@krava>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 14:27:17 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/15] perf stat: factor out event handling loop into
dispatch_events()
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 10:46:15AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>
> Consolidate event dispatching loops for fork, attach and system
> wide monitoring use cases into common dispatch_events() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> index 3e11f854ffc8..723f1fe27d63 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> @@ -550,6 +550,30 @@ static bool is_target_alive(struct target *_target,
> return false;
> }
>
> +static int dispatch_events(bool forks, int timeout, int interval, int *times, struct timespec *ts)
> +{
> + bool stop = false;
> + int child_exited = 0, status = 0;
> +
> + while (1) {
> + if (forks)
> + child_exited = waitpid(child_pid, &status, WNOHANG);
> + else
> + child_exited = !is_target_alive(&target, evsel_list->core.threads) ? 1 : 0;
> +
> + if (done || stop || child_exited)
> + break;
can (done || stop) be in the while condition and
we'd check just child_exited in here?
> +
> + nanosleep(ts, NULL);
> + if (timeout)
> + stop = true;
can we just break out in here? like the original code?
I don't think we need the extra iteration
> + else
> + stop = handle_interval(interval, times);
same here..?
thanks,
jirka
> + }
> +
> + return status;
> +}
> +
SNIP
Powered by blists - more mailing lists