[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <490c0811-50cd-0802-2cbc-9c031ef309f6@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 14:27:36 +0200
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@...iatek.com>,
Haiyan Song <haiyanx.song@...el.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
kirill@...temov.name, ak@...ux.intel.com, dave@...olabs.net,
jack@...e.cz, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, paulus@...ba.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, hpa@...or.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
kemi.wang@...el.com, Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@...il.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>,
vinayak menon <vinayakm.list@...il.com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>, sj38.park@...il.com,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
haren@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org,
miles.chen@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/31] Speculative page faults
Le 06/07/2020 à 11:25, Chinwen Chang a écrit :
> On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 16:19 +0800, Haiyan Song wrote:
>> Hi Laurent,
>>
>> I downloaded your script and run it on Intel 2s skylake platform with spf-v12 patch
>> serials.
>>
>> Here attached the output results of this script.
>>
>> The following comparison result is statistics from the script outputs.
>>
>> a). Enable THP
>> SPF_0 change SPF_1
>> will-it-scale.page_fault2.per_thread_ops 2664190.8 -11.7% 2353637.6
>> will-it-scale.page_fault3.per_thread_ops 4480027.2 -14.7% 3819331.9
>>
>>
>> b). Disable THP
>> SPF_0 change SPF_1
>> will-it-scale.page_fault2.per_thread_ops 2653260.7 -10% 2385165.8
>> will-it-scale.page_fault3.per_thread_ops 4436330.1 -12.4% 3886734.2
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Haiyan Song
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:44:47AM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>>> Le 14/06/2019 à 10:37, Laurent Dufour a écrit :
>>>> Please find attached the script I run to get these numbers.
>>>> This would be nice if you could give it a try on your victim node and share the result.
>>>
>>> Sounds that the Intel mail fitering system doesn't like the attached shell script.
>>> Please find it there: https://gist.github.com/ldu4/a5cc1a93f293108ea387d43d5d5e7f44
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Laurent.
>>>
>
> Hi Laurent,
>
> We merged SPF v11 and some patches from v12 into our platforms. After
> several experiments, we observed SPF has obvious improvements on the
> launch time of applications, especially for those high-TLP ones,
>
> # launch time of applications(s):
>
> package version w/ SPF w/o SPF improve(%)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Baidu maps 10.13.3 0.887 0.98 9.49
> Taobao 8.4.0.35 1.227 1.293 5.10
> Meituan 9.12.401 1.107 1.543 28.26
> WeChat 7.0.3 2.353 2.68 12.20
> Honor of Kings 1.43.1.6 6.63 6.713 1.24
That's great news, thanks for reporting this!
>
> By the way, we have verified our platforms with those patches and
> achieved the goal of mass production.
Another good news!
For my information, what is your targeted hardware?
Cheers,
Laurent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists