[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6155735.5LkVgl88Ba@pc-42>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 15:29:19 +0200
From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] staging: wfx: fix uninitialized variable bytes_done
On Monday 6 July 2020 15:20:17 CEST Colin King wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The variable bytes_done is not initialized and hence the first
> FIFO size check on bytes_done may be breaking prematurely from
> the loop if bytes_done contains a large bogus uninitialized value.
> Fix this by initializing bytes_done to zero.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
> Fixes: a9408ad79ff3 ("staging: wfx: load the firmware faster")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Good catch!
I am surprised that my gcc hasn't caught that.
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
> index d9a886f3e64b..206c6cf6511c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int wait_ncp_status(struct wfx_dev *wdev, u32 status)
> static int upload_firmware(struct wfx_dev *wdev, const u8 *data, size_t len)
> {
> int ret;
> - u32 offs, bytes_done;
> + u32 offs, bytes_done = 0;
> ktime_t now, start;
>
> if (len % DNLD_BLOCK_SIZE) {
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>
--
Jérôme Pouiller
Powered by blists - more mailing lists