[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200706160442.GA19741@iZj6chx1xj0e0buvshuecpZ>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 00:04:42 +0800
From: Peng Liu <iwtbavbm@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de
Subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: dome some cleanup for push_dl_task()
'commit 840d719604b0 ("sched/deadline: Update rq_clock of later_rq when pushing a task")'
introduced the update_rq_clock() to fix the "used-before-update" bug.
'commit f4904815f97a ("sched/deadline: Fix double accounting of rq/running bw in push & pull")'
took away the bug source(add_running_bw()).
We no longer need to update rq_clock in advance, let activate_task()
worry about that.
Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <iwtbavbm@...il.com>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 504d2f51b0d6..c3fa11f84d93 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -2104,13 +2104,7 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq)
deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0);
set_task_cpu(next_task, later_rq->cpu);
-
- /*
- * Update the later_rq clock here, because the clock is used
- * by the cpufreq_update_util() inside __add_running_bw().
- */
- update_rq_clock(later_rq);
- activate_task(later_rq, next_task, ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK);
+ activate_task(later_rq, next_task, 0);
ret = 1;
resched_curr(later_rq);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists