[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2b4deacfc7541e3adea2f36a6f44262@EXMBDFT11.ad.twosigma.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 17:13:35 +0000
From: Nicolas Viennot <Nicolas.Viennot@...sigma.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
CC: Adrian Reber <areber@...hat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <ovzxemul@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Dmitry Safonov" <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Michał Cłapiński <mclapinski@...gle.com>,
"Kamil Yurtsever" <kyurtsever@...gle.com>,
Dirk Petersen <dipeit@...il.com>,
Christine Flood <chf@...hat.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Radostin Stoyanov <rstoyanov1@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"selinux@...r.kernel.org" <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 3/3] prctl: Allow ptrace capable processes to change
/proc/self/exe
> > This is scary. But I believe it is safe.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>
> >
> > I am a bit curious about the implications of the selinux patch.
> > IIUC you are using the permission of the tracing process to execute
> > the file without transition, so this is a way to work around the
> > policy which might prevent the tracee from doing so.
> > Given that SELinux wants to be MAC, I'm not *quite* sure that's
> > considered kosher. You also are skipping the PROCESS__PTRACE to
> > SECCLASS_PROCESS check which selinux_bprm_set_creds does later on.
> > Again I'm just not quite sure what's considered normal there these
> > days.
> >
> > Paul, do you have input there?
>
> I agree, the SELinux hook looks wrong. Building on what Christian said, this looks more like a ptrace operation than an exec operation.
Serge, Paul, Christian,
I made a PoC to demonstrate the change of /proc/self/exe without CAP_SYS_ADMIN using only ptrace and execve.
You may find it here: https://github.com/nviennot/run_as_exe
What do you recommend to relax the security checks in the kernel when it comes to changing the exe link?
Nico
Powered by blists - more mailing lists