[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200706204913.20347-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:49:09 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH for 5.8 0/4] rseq cpu_id ABI fix
Hi,
Recent integration of rseq into glibc unearthed an issue with inaccurate
cpu_id field for newly created tasks. This series includes a fix for the
underlying issue (meant to be backported to stable), as well as new rseq
flags to let user-space know that the kernel implements this fix, so
glibc and other rseq users can use this flag to know whether they can
safely use rseq without risk of corrupting their per-cpu data. This new
flag could either be added only to the master branch (no stable
backport) or backported to stable, depending on what seems the most
appropriate.
This is an RFC aiming for quick inclusion into the Linux kernel, unless
we prefer reverting the entire rseq glibc integration and try again in 6
months. Their upcoming release is on August 3rd, so we need to take a
decision on this matter quickly.
Thanks,
Mathieu
Mathieu Desnoyers (4):
sched: Fix unreliable rseq cpu_id for new tasks
rseq: Introduce RSEQ_FLAG_REGISTER
rseq: Introduce RSEQ_FLAG_RELIABLE_CPU_ID
rseq: selftests: Expect reliable cpu_id field
include/uapi/linux/rseq.h | 15 +++++-
kernel/rseq.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++-------------
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +
tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c | 10 +++-
4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists