[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:50:56 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, rui.zhang@...el.com
Cc: amit.kucheria@...durent.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: netlink: Fix compilation error when CONFIG_NET=n
On 7/7/20 8:49 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/07/2020 17:47, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 7/7/20 2:01 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> When the network is not configured, the netlink are disabled on all
>>> the system. The thermal framework assumed the netlink are always
>>> opt-in.
>>>
>>> Fix this by adding a Kconfig option for the netlink notification,
>>> defaulting to yes and depending on CONFIG_NET.
>>>
>>> As the change implies multiple stubs and in order to not pollute the
>>> internal thermal header, the thermal_nelink.h has been added and
>>> included in the thermal_core.h, so this one regain some kind of
>>> clarity.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 10 ++++
>>> drivers/thermal/Makefile | 5 +-
>>> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h | 20 +------
>>> drivers/thermal/thermal_netlink.h | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/thermal_netlink.h
>>>
>>
>>
>> Hm, now I get this:
>>
>> ../drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c: In function ‘thermal_cdev_set_cur_state’:
>> ../drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c:182:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘thermal_notify_cdev_update’; did you mean ‘thermal_notify_cdev_delete’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> thermal_notify_cdev_update(cdev->id, target);
>>
>>
>> or should that call be to thermal_notify_cdev_state_update()?
>
> Ah right, the patch applies on top of the v4 which is not yet in
> linux-next, I'm waiting for the kernelci loop result.
OK, that explains why I had a little trouble applying the patch.
thanks.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists