lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 7 Jul 2020 10:09:41 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
        dick kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 7 (scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c)

On 7/7/20 1:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20200706:
> 

on i386:

when CONFIG_ACPI is not set/enabled:


../drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:1265:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_cpu_idle_time'; did you mean 'get_cpu_device'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]


The cpufreq people want justification for using
get_cpu_idle_time().  Please see
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20200707030943.xkocccy6qy2c3hrx@vireshk-i7/



-- 
~Randy
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists