linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 7 (scsi/lpfc/lpfc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Jul 2020 10:09:41 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
        dick kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 7 (scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c)

On 7/7/20 1:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20200706:
> 

on i386:

when CONFIG_ACPI is not set/enabled:

../drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:1265:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_cpu_idle_time'; did you mean 'get_cpu_device'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

The cpufreq people want justification for using
get_cpu_idle_time().  Please see
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20200707030943.xkocccy6qy2c3hrx@vireshk-i7/

-- 
~Randy
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>