lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:15:08 -0400
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 02/14] KVM: Cache as_id in kvm_memory_slot

On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 12:56:58PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > It's a single line of code, and there's more than one
> > > "shouldn't" in the above.
> > 
> > If you want, I can both set it and add the comment.  Thanks,
> 
> Why bother with the comment?  It'd be wrong in the sense that the as_id is
> always valid/accurate, even if npages == 0.

Sorry I'm confused.. when npages==0, why as_id field is meaningful?  Even if
the id field is meaningless after the slot is successfully removed, or am I
wrong?

My understanding is that after your dynamic slot work, we'll only have at most
one extra memslot that was just removed, and that slot should be meaningless as
a whole.  Feel free to correct me.

-- 
Peter Xu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ