[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:27:07 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/17] rcu/tree: Skip entry into the page
allocator for PREEMPT_RT
On 2020-07-06 16:29:49 [-0400], Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Anyway, I think as we discussed on IRC, your proposal will work for both
> kernels while allowing us to keep the internal lock as raw.
Why can't we use the migrate_disable() and spinlock_t?
> thanks,
>
> - Joel
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists