[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 12:49:27 +0200
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: ohad@...ery.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, s-anna@...com,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Address runtime PM issues
Hi,
Le mar. 30 juin 2020 à 10:31, Mathieu Poirier
<mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> a écrit :
> This set follows the conversation that took place here[1] and provides
> the "two small patches" I alluded to at the end of the thread.
>
> Paul Cercueil: patch 1/2 is compile tested only - please see that it
> does what
> you want.
Still works fine, so
Tested-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
for the patchset.
Cheers,
-Paul
> Suman Anna: Please test on your side and confirm that it addresses
> the Omap
> regression.
>
> Applies on top of rproc-next (7dcef3988eed)
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
> [1].
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-remoteproc/20200515104340.10473-1-paul@crapouillou.net/T/#t
>
> Mathieu Poirier (2):
> remoteproc: ingenic: Move clock handling to prepare/unprepare
> callbacks
> Revert "remoteproc: Add support for runtime PM"
>
> drivers/remoteproc/ingenic_rproc.c | 84
> +++++++++-------------------
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 17 +-----
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists