[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 18:51:36 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
tj@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru,
daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com, yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, lkp@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
shakeelb@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
richard.weiyang@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 07/20] mm/thp: narrow lru locking
在 2020/7/6 下午7:35, Matthew Wilcox 写道:
>> Would you like to give some comments or share your concern of this patchset,
>> specialy for THP part?
> I don't have the brain space to understand this patch set fully at
> the moment. I'll note that the realtime folks are doing their best to
> stamp out users of local_irq_disable(), so they won't be pleased to see
> you adding a new one. Also, you removed the comment explaining why the
> lock needed to be taken.
>
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for response!
As to the local_irq_disable(), we could use local_irq_save(), but Hugh Dickin
suggest it's not necessary here. Also there are still much local_irq_disable()
in code. Hope it would be a big trouble for only one extra.
yes, The lru_lock comments is a bit early to remove, that should do in next
TestClearPageLRU part. but since it would be changed soon. It won't be a critical
thing. Anyway I can change it to back in next version.
Thanks
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists