linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] watchdog: Add common nowayout parameter to booke

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Jul 2020 12:13:52 +0000
From:   Timothy Myers <timothy.myers@...ran.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        "linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Boike <david.boike@...ran.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] watchdog: Add common nowayout parameter to
 booke_wdt driver




From: linux-watchdog-owner@...r.kernel.org <linux-watchdog-owner@...r.kernel.org> on behalf of Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 5:18 PM
To: Timothy Myers <timothy.myers@...ran.com>; Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>; linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; David Boike <david.boike@...ran.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] watchdog: Add common nowayout parameter to booke_wdt driver 
 
On 7/6/20 9:33 AM, Timothy Myers wrote:
>> Add the common "nowayout" parameter to booke_wdt to make this behavior
>> selectable at runtime and to make the implementation more consistent with
>> many other watchdog drivers.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Timothy Myers <timothy.myers@...ran.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>> 
>> Changes in:
>> v2:
>> Added Guenter Roeck's reviewed-by tag at his request
>> v3:
>> Fix whitespace formatting in message.
>> ---
>
>Change log goes here.
>
>I applied your patch to watchdog-next, but there is still something
>in it which prevents it from showing up at
>https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/list/, even though
>I do see it at https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/.
>
>Looking into the e-mail source, I think the problem may be due
>to some Outlook specific formatting in the raw message:
>
>Add the common "nowayout" parameter to booke_wdt to make this behavior=0A=
>selectable at runtime and to make the implementation more consistent with=
>=0A=
>many other watchdog drivers.=0A=
>=0A=
>
>and so on. If that is persistent, it may make sense to fix it, or
>you might wonder why some of your patches are being ignored.
>
>Thanks,
>Guenter
Thank you for applying the patch, and thank you again for your help with my mail. I'll look into the formatting.