[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:38:54 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Matt Denton <mpdenton@...gle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Chris Palmer <palmer@...gle.com>,
Robert Sesek <rsesek@...gle.com>,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] fs: Expand __receive_fd() to accept existing fd
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 01:17:18PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Expand __receive_fd() with support for replace_fd() for the coming seccomp
> "addfd" ioctl(). Add new wrapper receive_fd_replace() for the new behavior
> and update existing wrappers to retain old behavior.
>
> Thanks to Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> for pointing out an
> uninitialized variable exposure in an earlier version of this patch.
>
> Reviewed-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
Thanks!
(One tiny-nit below.)
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
> fs/file.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> include/linux/file.h | 10 +++++++---
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
> index 0efdcf413210..11313ff36802 100644
> --- a/fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/file.c
> @@ -937,6 +937,7 @@ int replace_fd(unsigned fd, struct file *file, unsigned flags)
> /**
> * __receive_fd() - Install received file into file descriptor table
> *
> + * @fd: fd to install into (if negative, a new fd will be allocated)
> * @file: struct file that was received from another process
> * @ufd: __user pointer to write new fd number to
> * @o_flags: the O_* flags to apply to the new fd entry
> @@ -950,7 +951,7 @@ int replace_fd(unsigned fd, struct file *file, unsigned flags)
> *
> * Returns newly install fd or -ve on error.
> */
> -int __receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags)
> +int __receive_fd(int fd, struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags)
> {
> struct socket *sock;
> int new_fd;
> @@ -960,18 +961,30 @@ int __receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags)
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> - new_fd = get_unused_fd_flags(o_flags);
> - if (new_fd < 0)
> - return new_fd;
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + new_fd = get_unused_fd_flags(o_flags);
> + if (new_fd < 0)
> + return new_fd;
> + } else
> + new_fd = fd;
This is nitpicky but coding style technically wants us to use braces
around both branches if one of them requires them. ;)
>
> if (ufd) {
> error = put_user(new_fd, ufd);
> if (error) {
> - put_unused_fd(new_fd);
> + if (fd < 0)
> + put_unused_fd(new_fd);
> return error;
> }
> }
>
> + if (fd < 0)
> + fd_install(new_fd, get_file(file));
> + else {
> + error = replace_fd(new_fd, file, o_flags);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Bump the usage count and install the file. The resulting value of
> * "error" is ignored here since we only need to take action when
> @@ -982,7 +995,6 @@ int __receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags)
> sock_update_netprioidx(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> sock_update_classid(&sock->sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> }
> - fd_install(new_fd, get_file(file));
> return new_fd;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/file.h b/include/linux/file.h
> index d9fee9f5c8da..225982792fa2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/file.h
> +++ b/include/linux/file.h
> @@ -92,18 +92,22 @@ extern void put_unused_fd(unsigned int fd);
>
> extern void fd_install(unsigned int fd, struct file *file);
>
> -extern int __receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd,
> +extern int __receive_fd(int fd, struct file *file, int __user *ufd,
> unsigned int o_flags);
> static inline int receive_fd_user(struct file *file, int __user *ufd,
> unsigned int o_flags)
> {
> if (ufd == NULL)
> return -EFAULT;
> - return __receive_fd(file, ufd, o_flags);
> + return __receive_fd(-1, file, ufd, o_flags);
> }
> static inline int receive_fd(struct file *file, unsigned int o_flags)
> {
> - return __receive_fd(file, NULL, o_flags);
> + return __receive_fd(-1, file, NULL, o_flags);
> +}
> +static inline int receive_fd_replace(int fd, struct file *file, unsigned int o_flags)
> +{
> + return __receive_fd(fd, file, NULL, o_flags);
> }
>
> extern void flush_delayed_fput(void);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists