[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcsvvsmcW_hSRv-mg3v5Z_7c0S-r7WNVOVi-70dE_LvmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 18:31:21 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] gpio: max77620: Don't handle disabled interrupts
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 1:54 PM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
> 08.07.2020 13:11, Andy Shevchenko пишет:
...
> It should be unnecessary since we now see that the handle_nested_irq()
> checks whether interrupt was requested and if it wasn't, then particular
> GPIO interrupt will be treated as spurious [1]. The pending == 0
> condition is an extreme case, I don't think that there is a need to
> optimize it without any good reason.
>
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.8-rc3/source/kernel/irq/chip.c#L485
>
> Hence it should be better to drop this patch.
Fine with me, thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists