[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200708153635.GB26743@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 17:36:35 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-pool: use single atomic pool for both DMA zones
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 12:35:34PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > Which allows me to switch between ACPI/DT on the machine. In DT mode it
> > works fine now,
>
> Nice, would that count as a Tested-by from you?
>
> > but with ACPI I continue to have failures unless I
> > disable CMA via cma=0 on the kernel command line.
>
> Yes, I see why, in atomic_pool_expand() memory is allocated from CMA without
> checking its correctness. That calls for a separate fix. I'll try to think of
> something.
I think we need a dma_coherent_ok for the allocations from the
pool and then fall back to the next better one to get started. And
yes, CMA is a bit of a mess, that generally needs better checks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists