[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <481e512a-0dd3-ae19-8f32-ed781af28038@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 10:38:44 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Javier González <javier@...igon.com>
Cc: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
bcrl@...ck.org, hch@...radead.org, damien.lemoal@....com,
asml.silence@...il.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
mb@...htnvm.io, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Selvakumar S <selvakuma.s1@...sung.com>,
Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>,
Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] io_uring: add support for zone-append
On 7/8/20 10:33 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Javier González wrote:
>>> I just wanted to get clarification there, because to me it sounded like
>>> you expected Kanchan to do it, and Kanchan assuming it "was sorted". I'd
>>> consider that a prerequisite for the append series as far as io_uring is
>>> concerned, hence _someone_ needs to actually do it ;-)
>
> I don't know that it's a prerequisite in terms of the patches actually
> depend on it. I appreciate you want it first to ensure that we don't bloat
> the kiocb.
Maybe not for the series, but for the io_uring addition it is.
>> I believe Kanchan meant that now the trade-off we were asking to
>> clear out is sorted.
>>
>> We will send a new version shortly for the current functionality - we
>> can see what we are missing on when the uring interface is clear.
>
> I've started work on a patch series for this. Mostly just waiting for
> compilation now ... should be done in the next few hours.
Great!
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists