[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbszVdmRY4V=Z=vVPAdbx4q=26F-OcnZu2w3-BNk+0ohQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 09:18:29 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] gpio: gpio-syscon: Fix formatting issues which
confuse kerneldoc
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 3:33 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> Kerneldoc expects struct properties to be documented using the syntax
> '@.*: ', but no '@' has been provided in 'struct syscon_gpio_data's
> header. Add them to stop confusing kerneldoc.
>
> Fixes the following W=1 warnings:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-syscon.c:48: warning: Function parameter or member 'compatible' not described in 'syscon_gpio_data'
> drivers/gpio/gpio-syscon.c:48: warning: Function parameter or member 'flags' not described in 'syscon_gpio_data'
> drivers/gpio/gpio-syscon.c:48: warning: Function parameter or member 'bit_count' not described in 'syscon_gpio_data'
> drivers/gpio/gpio-syscon.c:48: warning: Function parameter or member 'dat_bit_offset' not described in 'syscon_gpio_data'
> drivers/gpio/gpio-syscon.c:48: warning: Function parameter or member 'dir_bit_offset' not described in 'syscon_gpio_data'
> drivers/gpio/gpio-syscon.c:48: warning: Function parameter or member 'set' not described in 'syscon_gpio_data'
>
> Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Patch applied!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists