lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200708072849.GM3500@dell>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jul 2020 08:28:49 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     jejb@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fix a bunch SCSI related W=1 warnings

On Wed, 08 Jul 2020, Martin K. Petersen wrote:

> 
> Lee,
> 
> > Out of interest, do you know of any other efforts to fix W=1 warnings
> > in SCSI?
> 
> I am not.
> 
> I try to encourage that all new patches get compiled with C=1/W=1. If I
> could, I would strictly enforce this. However, there is just too much
> vintage code around at this point. And even some of the most actively
> developed "contemporary" drivers suffer from a large amount of sparse
> warnings.

Exactly.  This is what spurred me on in the first place.  I really
wanted to build my own subsytems with W=1, but due to the very many
spurious build warnings I was forced to avoid them.  Once I fixed my
own, I thought "why not fix others", and here we are.

Backlight, MFD, PWM, USB, Misc, Regulator, GPIO, ASoC and MMC are all
clean.  Now it's SCSI's turn.

> warnings. Would love to see things cleaned up.

Great.  Watch this space.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ