lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3Mf_+-MY5kdeY7sqwUgCUi=PksWz1pGDy+o0ZfgF93Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jul 2020 09:47:33 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        Mickaël Salaün <mickael.salaun@....gouv.fr>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Vincent Dagonneau <vincent.dagonneau@....gouv.fr>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 09/12] arch: Wire up landlock() syscall

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 9:31 AM Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
> On 08/07/2020 09:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:10 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
> >
> >> index f4a01305d9a6..a63a411a74d5 100644
> >> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> >> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>
> OK, I'll rebase the next series on linux-next.

Just change the number to the next free one, without actually rebasing.
It's always a bit messy to have multiple syscalls added, but I think that
causes the least confusion.

> Do you know if there is other syscalls on their way to linux-next?

None that I'm aware of.

> Are the other parts of arch/syscall OK for you?

The arch/* and include/uapi/asm-generic changes look ok to me.
I'll reply to the syscall implementation separately/

     Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ