[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4eedae20-903f-77c6-c6e9-fbf3db209bcf@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 10:44:19 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
broonie@...nel.org
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com,
tiwai@...e.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vkoul@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] ASoC: q6asm: make commands specific to streams
Thanks Pierre for quick review,
On 07/07/2020 17:52, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
>
>> @@ -184,8 +186,8 @@ static void event_handler(uint32_t opcode,
>> uint32_t token,
>> switch (opcode) {
>> case ASM_CLIENT_EVENT_CMD_RUN_DONE:
>> if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
>> - q6asm_write_async(prtd->audio_client,
>> - prtd->pcm_count, 0, 0, NO_TIMESTAMP);
>> + q6asm_write_async(prtd->audio_client, prtd->stream_id,
>> + prtd->pcm_count, 0, 0, 0);
>
> sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6asm.h:#define NO_TIMESTAMP 0xFF00
>
> is the change on the previous line intentional?
May be not!
Plan is that the users of these apis will send flags directly instead of
boiler plating this!
This change should go as part of next patch("[PATCH 04/11] ASoC: q6asm:
use flags directly from asm-dai") which would make it much clear!
thanks,
srini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists