lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <HK2PR01MB32816EAA7257124DD4A4CB6EFA670@HK2PR01MB3281.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jul 2020 09:45:56 +0000
From:   Johnson CH Chen (陳昭勳) 
        <JohnsonCH.Chen@...a.com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:     Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: am335x: add support for Moxa UC-8100A-ME
 open platform

Hi,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: am335x: add support for Moxa
> UC-8100A-ME open platform
> 
> * Johnson CH Chen (陳昭勳) <JohnsonCH.Chen@...a.com> [200707 03:24]:
> > UC-8100A-ME is advanced of UC-8100-ME-T, and UC-8100-ME-T is
> deprecated.
> >
> > UC-8100A-ME provides larger RAM and eMMC, better input current than
> > UC-8100-ME-T's, and it supports selectable LTE module for US/EU/APAC.
> 
> So what about the existing users of UC-8100-ME-T?
> 
> To me it seems you should just add am335x-moxa-uc-8100-common.dtsi or
> similar. And then have minimal dts files for each model. That way you can
> easily keep the support UC-8100-ME-T around.

Thanks for your good suggestion, I'll take this info for our internal discussion.

Best regards,
Johnson

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ