[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN4PR0401MB35981798216DE34D9EF28FA69B670@SN4PR0401MB3598.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:14:08 +0000
From: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/30] scsi: libfc: fc_disc: trivial: Fix spelling mistake
of 'discovery'
On 08/07/2020 14:12, Lee Jones wrote:
> Obviously I'd be okay with that, but it will depend on whether his
> tree is able to be rebased. Many public trees are unrebasable (if
> that's a word).
Yeah but in this early stage SCSI usually is re-baseable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists