[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200708125438.GB5221@shinobu>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 08:54:38 -0400
From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
To: Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
bgolaszewski@...libre.com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] gpio: xilinx: Utilize generic bitmap_get_value
and _set_value.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 01:44:23PM +0530, Syed Nayyar Waris wrote:
> This patch reimplements the xgpio_set_multiple function in
> drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c to use the new generic functions:
> bitmap_get_value and bitmap_set_value. The code is now simpler
> to read and understand. Moreover, instead of looping for each bit
> in xgpio_set_multiple function, now we can check each channel at
> a time and save cycles.
> ---
> Changes in v9:
> - Remove looping of 'for_each_set_clump' and instead process two
> halves of a 64-bit bitmap separately or individually. Use normal spin_lock
> call for second inner lock. And take the spin_lock_init call outside the 'if'
> condition in the 'probe' function of driver.
>
> Changes in v8:
> - No change.
>
> Changes in v7:
> - No change.
>
> Changes in v6:
> - No change.
>
> Changes in v5:
> - Minor change: Inline values '32' and '64' in code for better
> code readability.
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Minor change: Inline values '32' and '64' in code for better
> code readability.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - No change.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - No change
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> index 67f9f82e0db0..48393d06fb55 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> @@ -136,39 +136,39 @@ static void xgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
> static void xgpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned long *mask,
> unsigned long *bits)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned long flag;
Hi Syed,
I have a couple minor suggestions in case you submit a version 10. Leave
this variable named "flags" because it refers to CPU flags which will
likely be more than one flag anyway.
> @@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ static int xgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> chip->gpio_width[0] = 32;
>
> spin_lock_init(&chip->gpio_lock[0]);
> + spin_lock_init(&chip->gpio_lock[1]);
>
> if (of_property_read_u32(np, "xlnx,is-dual", &is_dual))
> is_dual = 0;
> @@ -314,7 +315,6 @@ static int xgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> &chip->gpio_width[1]))
> chip->gpio_width[1] = 32;
>
Remove this whitespace as well.
Thanks,
William Breathitt Gray
> - spin_lock_init(&chip->gpio_lock[1]);
> }
>
> chip->gc.base = -1;
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists